No, Mr. Brison, the chair has the floor.
Monsieur Arthur, on this issue, I'll repeat again what the motion actually says: “That the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology study the Government of Canada's decision to phase out the position of National Science Advisor.” This is related to Dr. Carty as the national science advisor. Now, if there is an issue with his expenses as the national science advisor, that is relevant to the motion.
With respect to your questions, you're really testing the bounds of relevance unless you relate them to his position as the national science advisor.