Thank you.
I think I would start with a general statement that just says again that it relates to a balance in the system, but it also relates to the gap.
I'll use very specific anecdotal evidence. Back in 1990 we were funding a program in universities called IRIS. There's a graduate student by the name of Shahram Tafazoli who invented some technologies for managing heavy equipment: monitoring it, etc.—all sorts of different aspects. When he graduated, he started a small company called Motion Metrics, and through our Precarn side, through Precarn funding, we were able to provide small amounts of funding into that company. Following that, he actually worked with Syncrude on a larger project.
So we filled the gap, as it were, and now literally his company is selling his technology around the world. It's still a very small company, but that's an example of what I mean, because now he employs nine or ten other high-value-added people in his company. It's a matter of getting the technology matched against a user need and then filling the gap a little bit so that the company can become successful.
But that's only part of it. We've talked about tax credits, the dollar, capital cost allowance. All of these things have to be balanced to create the right environment. My argument is related to filling in the gap as well.