Okay.
My last question or point is something that perhaps you can provide further information on. There is a genuine concern about a loss of employment in the manufacturing sector and increasing employment in the service sector, but there is a concern about those who have been working in manufacturing for a number of years trying to make the transition, particularly if the median wage is lower in the service sector than in the manufacturing sector.
When you analyze that problem, is there something Industry Canada can give us to highlight the relationship between various sectors? It seems to me the more you delve into this, the more complicated it is for a company like Intuit, but even more for a sector like oil and gas. Everybody assumes it's natural resources. That's what it is, yet manufacturing is huge in that sector. Forty per cent of the contracts for the oil sands go to the province of Ontario. Yet in terms of the services sector, this is an oil field service company. Is that a service sector or is that energy? What is that?
Is there something you could provide, say a pick-up between those who perhaps lose a job in one sector and move to another sector? Is there anything you have on that, but also the relationship between the sectors, such as an OEM, an anchor that then draws in the other services? For instance, the GM plant in Oshawa, what is the impact on the related services if you go to two shifts? The economy is so dynamic. Is there a way for any information you have to help the committee understand that, as well as the fact that perhaps there is a simple way of looking? We look at energy, manufacturing, and service. I don't know if that is the perfect way of analyzing the economy.
So those are just some general thoughts. I don't know if you have any reaction or if there is any information you can provide to help the committee to better understand. That would be helpful.