First of all, it isn't a different group; it's a single group with a sense of common purpose, but different people have different roles within the group. But the people who are setting the priorities--not the mandate, but the priorities--are the people who are the users of the information. We think it's important to get the view of the users of the information in setting the priorities, as opposed to scientific priorities that might be driven by curiosity or capacity.
We believe that having the clients and the users of the information...it keeps our information focused. As I said earlier in my presentation, the department is the main client for much of its science, and the science is related to decisions that the minister or the government must take. If you're going to influence those decisions, it needs to be timely and it needs to be relevant to the decision, not relevant to the general area. And those two need to be actively managed by science managers, which is quite different from what you would see in the academic sector.