Well, we certainly worry about such things. Who would not?
You are attempting to establish a world-class facility in a situation of great uncertainty, where you're attempting to make promises to international groups who are wanting to come and perform experiments at your facility. However, we were given assurance by the ad hoc actions taken by NSERC and CFI that they appreciated the value of not losing the opportunities that we had—and they should have, based on the strong peer reviews all of these projects had received—and in coming forward with the funding for the short term.
The difficulty is that it is not an appropriate way to do things, if you're going to start out and spend money from a capital point of view—and we have spent a substantial amount through CFI on very good projects—to not, at the same time, have a mechanism whereby you have the operating funding in place, matching the decisions that were made in the first place on the basis of strong peer review. NEPTUNE and SNO and the Amundsen were the top three out of 37 projects that were put forward at the time CFI made those decisions. And the fact that the operating program is not there to go along with these capital decisions for the long term is the thing that's missing. Right now, it is not within NSERC's capability to be able to provide such long-term operating funding without impacting the experiments that would happen at these facilities.