Yes, absolutely, and there are plenty of precedents for that. The TRIUMF example that I talked about has a blue-ribbon panel that's specially brought in every five years to review the next annual plan and determine, based on past performance, whether further funding should be brought in. So there are models there, absolutely.
Should it be outside or within the existing councils? I could make an argument either way. I don't think that's the issue for us. I think what we want is a fund that is specially targeted towards these very special and selected high-level operational issues. If it's administered through NSERC because that's seen to be the most appropriate channel, so be it; if it's administered outside of it, as is true for TRIUMF at the moment, so be it. That, I think, is a secondary issue. It's having the mechanism in place that recognizes that it's important.