I don't mean to interrupt, but I have a limited amount of time here.
Basically what you've cited in your report is that you're looking for relief in terms of the airport rent situation. You're looking for some work on ADS, and we're talking about better animation and marketing of certain tourism products. Doesn't it take in a much broader picture here in terms of how we move forward?
Even if, hypothetically, those few things were considered and there were changes made to those, is that in itself going to predict that the tourism industry would, in turn, grow? We have to look at how Canada performs on its own merits. And yes, I know the travel deficit is there, and the rankings, but at the end of the day what's most important is that we have a climate here where tourism, like other business sectors, can prosper.
In fact, what I'm seeing is that your report is an indictment on what government's role has been in the past, but in fact, what we have is a contrary image in terms of where the industry is now. It has responded quite well. In fact, the only thing we know for sure is that in the future other geopolitical, social shocks are going to come our way. Isn't that our best way to strengthen our economy and business climate here so that we can attract more tourism investment and opportunity?