Well, from that spinoff, you could take that money and put it into a tax break for all companies for investment.
I think the answer I'm giving you is one you'd get from a lot of economists. We're really against targeted government funding to particular firms or sectors. You are much better off to take that money and use it to reduce corporate income taxes, or make depreciation rates lower, then let the market sort out who can best take advantage of it.
I know things are tough in the auto business, and they're tougher in Oshawa than most other places. To anybody who comes in front of you speaking about the auto industry, be sure to ask them to what extent are these problems the problems? Because, frankly, General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford have been mismanaged. They have grossly lost market share to Honda and Toyota. Ask them how Honda and Toyota are doing in Canada. They're hiring people. They've been well-managed companies. They've designed their autos and priced them to sell.
The Canadian dollar's been a problem, but now the settlements that have been made in the U.S. cause further problems for the Canadian auto industry. They've moved the health care costs off to the unions. They have set certain commitments for production in the U.S. You know, we could allocate an awful lot of the taxpayers' money trying to save auto jobs in Oshawa. It could get very expensive.
The point is to understand why these companies are having their problems and what the competitive equilibrium is. I think the competitive equilibrium for those types of production in Canada is a tough story. It's a tough story. They haven't finished adjusting to the Canadian dollar, and they haven't even begun to adjust to the new U.S. auto agreement. So it's tough.