So it actually makes sense without the amendment, then, just to leave it as it is written. The amendment actually takes away the requirement for an opposition member, so let's just leave it as it is, maybe. Does it make sense to leave it as is?
I think the amendment you're moving actually takes away that requirement to have an opposition member, and I don't think you intend to do that. With your amendment, we could meet with three government members if we wanted to. I'm not sure that's what you intended. I'm thinking probably not.