I agree with Brian with regard to his request. The witnesses told us that they feel the bill is perfect, that nothing should be changed. It would be too easy for the department to tell us, in its conclusions, that pursuant to our request, no changes are required and that, in its opinion, the bill should stay as it is. That is not what we want. We want to know why some of the witnesses' recommendations were not retained and why others were. I do not want to hear that out of 50 recommendations, one was retained and that we should have a debate about whether on line two we should use this or that word. I do not entirely agree with that.
I really want these people to be involved in this matter. I want those who testified to get the answers to their questions. They should not just hear that there are no changes to be made to this bill. I want a more detailed answer.