This again goes back to the comments of the Canadian Bar Association. Under the Canada Business Corporations Act, which was the base document for drafting this bill, the way money is given in exchange for shares is regulated. In your financial statements, there is a requirement to keep track of a stated capital account, which is the money that's received for shares, and when you're doing your assets minus liabilities and you get your result, it's related to the stated capital account.
It only applies to shares, not to debt obligations. When we were drafting the bill, what we missed and what didn't come out until the Canadian Bar Association brought it out is that this is not an issue that needs to be dealt with in respect of debt obligations. The issue of how much money you get in exchange for a debt obligation is not a matter of statutory corporate governance, but a purely private commercial transaction, and therefore as requested by the Canadian Bar Association, we need to get rid of clause 29. It's not required.