Certainly I would like to speak to this.
We've been talking about the removal of parts 6 and 7. Part 6 is an older U.S. model and is inconsistent with what the provinces currently have. Most provinces have adopted a uniform securities transfer act, the exceptions being P.E.I. and Nova Scotia, and Nova Scotia has announced that it's moving in that direction. That covers transfers.
Part 6 would really overlap with existing law. Even if a statute does not exist, it does exist in precedents or in common law. It's because of the complexity of part 6, because we're trying to streamline, and because it would be a very unusual circumstance for this to be used. In the meantime, it's inconsistent with what the provinces have.
You will recall that the CBA, as well as Imagine Canada, did recommend its removal, saying that it's covered in other jurisdictions.
That's part 6. Do you want me to go to part 7?