Did you say the amendment to clause 2? Okay.
This is with respect to clarifying soliciting versus non-soliciting corporations, so that we can work towards a better go-forward definition of soliciting versus non-soliciting You'll recall that we had both the CBA and Imagine Canada and a number of different people talking about this definition as being a little confusing and needing some clarification.
The first one would be that the period covered would be immediately preceding the financial year in which the money was received; it's a change to paragraph (a) of the definition of “soliciting corporation” in clause 2.
We have both. I don't know how the chair would like to handle this matter, because we're making a recommendation and they're making a recommendation in the same area.