The document I have here—and I'll provide it to you—says that of 91% of allocations were used overall by the entire department, and Industry Canada only used 84% of its allocations. In this regard, I'm concerned about all of the challenges out there.
I want to quickly move to one last question, Mr. Minister, if I have time. On my right-to-repair bill, Bill C-273, you've asked for a voluntary agreement two days before the vote. But clearly, in the United States, the model is based on legislation. The EPA is what actually creates an operating agreement for the legislation that provides information to the aftermarket in the United States in a rules-based system.
Why would you want to bring forth a voluntary agreement? I've seen your letter at the eleventh hour that it would be based upon American legislation. But it would only be voluntary over here, versus that in the United States, where they actually have to provide it by legislation. Why are you asking that Canadians be treated differently by the automotive companies over here in Canada—by the foreign companies that will dictate the rules, and there'll be no recourse for the actual process—versus having a Canadian solution that would be rule-based and actually be quite similar to the one in United States, in the sense that it's backed by legislation and wouldn't be voluntary?