Yes. But the bill's scope really does depart from the anti-spam legislation found in other areas or among our international counterparts. For example, if you look to the EU directive and the U.K. act, they talk about direct marketing. The Australian spam act and the New Zealand spam act really define it towards direct marketing. Singapore looks at direct marketing.
Did you consider narrowing the scope? When you look at what your scope is, it's very, very broad; it's a catch-all. We've talked a bit about that. Other legislation around the world is absolutely more defined to direct marketing.
Do you have any comments on that?