Certainly. I think, for instance, there are legitimate e-mail marketers who want to communicate with their clientele. What we've tried to do is create both explicit consent and implied consent in those situations when there's a pre-existing business relationship.
I used to be in the legal beagle business. Let's say you've got clients. You're a lawyer with clients, and you want to send them updates about particular aspects of changes in the law; let's say anti-spam legislation, for instance. Obviously, there's a pre-existing business relationship, and those kinds of things do imply some consent by the receiver of that information, by the consumer of that information. We're not trying to interfere with the legitimate e-mail practices of legitimate businesses, of course.
We have the implied consent mentioned in the legislation. We can further hone that down in the regulations as well, where we can describe further circumstances where marketers can rely on implied consent. Again, we're not trying to interfere with the existing business relationships. We're trying to deal with bad guys who right now can drive a truck through the open barn door because there's no regulation.