Right.
Why don't you guys answer this too?
My own view is that we often try to get away from some of these definitional issues because early on we would have some of these discussions and spend half a day talking about what your definition is. It wasn't particularly productive, because the real focus was on where the harms are and what kinds of standards we want to set for what's acceptable and appropriate commercial marketing.
The legislation is obviously focused exclusively on the commercial side, and there's good reason for that from a constitutional perspective, I believe, but in terms of trying to ask if this is spam or unsolicited commercial e-mail, you could get a dozen people in here and everyone would give you a different answer in terms of how they define it.