I think when you look at the balance between trying to prohibit perfectly benign and beneficial programs and then trying to work your way out of it through, potentially, regulations that don't exist today to cover that situation, or trying to identify what really is a problem, it's a lot easier to define what malware is, because people know it, and then to leave the regulations available, as Mr. Courtois was saying, to be able to expand it.
I really do think there's going to be more variation and diversity in the use of different kinds of computer programs that are benign and useful on the Internet than there are going to be innovations in spammers. I think through diligent regulation we can deal with the new innovations in spammers, but I do have real concerns about dealing with legitimate innovations and making them legal one after another. I think that is very difficult.