I am assuming two things, but let me start with the first question. I was involved with a PIPEDA review and a number of other things. Some legislation has a timeframe to it in terms of an automatic review. Was there discussion at the task force that since this is new legislation, maybe we should put a five-year timeframe for review of this legislation and what its actual effect is? Was that discussed? How would you personally feel about it--obviously not representing the task force--if we added a timeframe to this proposed legislation in terms of an automatic review?
