Evidence of meeting #39 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was list.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Wayne Cole  Legislative Clerk, Committees Directorate, House of Commons
André Leduc  Policy Analyst, Electronic Commerce Policy, Department of Industry
Philip Palmer  Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Department of Industry

4:20 p.m.

Policy Analyst, Electronic Commerce Policy, Department of Industry

André Leduc

This is where we have permitted 7(1)(b) in PIPEDA to exist regarding the collection of electronic addresses. Proposed subsection (3) is about the unauthorized collection of personal information, and we didn't feel the exception set out in 7(1)(b) was appropriate to (3).

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Thank you.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

So this allows for more unauthorized collection?

4:20 p.m.

Policy Analyst, Electronic Commerce Policy, Department of Industry

André Leduc

No, this would limit the unauthorized collection. This is placing a further limitation on the unauthorized collection.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Mr. Masse, does that clarify things for you?

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Not entirely. I want to work through this.

4:20 p.m.

Policy Analyst, Electronic Commerce Policy, Department of Industry

André Leduc

Paragraph 7(1)(b) in PIPEDA would permit a private company to collect personal information without authorization with regard to an investigation in defence of a contract or a law. We're saying that limitation is not appropriate, that that allowance under proposed subsection (3) is not appropriate any longer. So it's a clear tightening of that.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

The interpretation I had was that this clause, without the change that is being recommended here, would actually open it to more exposure. So you're saying that the change that's just been presented, making it paragraphs 7(1)(a) to (d), is the tightening that's going to--

4:20 p.m.

Policy Analyst, Electronic Commerce Policy, Department of Industry

André Leduc

A significant tightening, yes.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Okay, because this is the one I raised with the minister in the House on Thursday. I want to make sure it's clear, because we haven't received this change until just now. It's not that I don't trust anyone around here.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Mr. Masse, do you have any further questions?

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

No, thank you, Mr. Chair.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Then we're going to go to Mr. Garneau.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

Mr. Chair, I just want to follow up on a clarification you provided that if we are to vote for this government change.... I'm concerned about amendments L-7 and L-9 specifically, that they would no longer be allowed to be brought forward.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

That's correct. If amendment G-55.1 is adopted by this committee, I will not allow amendments L-7, L-8, or L-9 to be moved.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

Can you spell it out for me--why?

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Because amendments L-7, L-8, and L-9 will contradict what has been adopted in amendment G-55.1.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

I understand. Thank you.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Once the committee has adopted a clause or an amendment to a clause, as chair I cannot revisit that amendment or that clause unless I have the unanimous consent of the committee to do so.

Mr. Rota.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Rota Liberal Nipissing—Timiskaming, ON

I'm not quite clear on amendment L-9. I'm fine with amendments L-7 and L-8, but maybe I can have the staff explain how amendment L-9 would contradict amendment G-55.1.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Okay. Just one moment.

Mr. Palmer, can you clarify for this committee whether or not amendment L-9 can stand if amendment G-55.1 is adopted?

4:25 p.m.

Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Department of Industry

Philip Palmer

You have the guy who's the expert on parliamentary procedure. I'm inclined to see it as Mr. Rota does, that it doesn't contradict any of the provisions in--

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Okay, so what I'll do, then, as chair I'll rule that I will allow amendment L-9 to be considered after the consideration of amendment G-55.1, regardless of whether or not it's adopted.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Rota Liberal Nipissing—Timiskaming, ON

No, that's fair. I just wanted to make sure they were--

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Thank you for asking the question.

We're still considering amendment G-55.1. We have an intervention from Mr. Masse, and then Madam Coady, and then--