I think Matt's right. If we go back to first principles, when we had a discussion with all four parties back on April 29, the AIA made it clear that they weren't interested in moving forward with any voluntary agreement unless it was similar to the NASTF agreement. As Matt said, we tried to get it as identical as possible.
Some of the awkward wording Matt mentioned I think actually resulted in some of the misunderstanding of what the agreement actually said. We got that clarified in the meeting we had with the AIA on October 15.