The other piece is that the CAPC was really focused on those manufacturing in Canada. So it has actually a fairly limited scope as to who is in CAPC. So you're right, there is a meeting on Friday. I'm not sure whether it's on the agenda formally or not, but I'm sure it will be raised, given who is in the room. It is important.
To your previous question, Mr. Masse, about folks pulling out, I wanted to mention that this is not the history we've seen. When companies say they're going to comply with something, especially when they write a letter to a minister and every MP saying they're going to do this, they tend not to pull out. Their history is very solid in this regard because they don't really like the repercussions that could come their way.
The other piece is that when an industry gets together and agrees to do something—and we have several times over history, especially between AIAMC and CVMA—there is a lot of peer pressure put on them. These are very competitive companies, and they don't like anyone to have even the slightest bit of competitive advantage in any part of the business. Whether or not it would create competitive advantage is beside the point. They want everyone playing by identical rules. I think it's important to note that the peer pressure that can be found amongst these manufacturers is pretty immense. Whether it's the current companies operating in Canada or possible new entrants, that's an important consideration that everyone takes into account.