Mr. Draimin, I'll have you comment on the submission you brought forward today. I'm trying to get my head wrapped around the suggestions you're making.
Obviously here in Canada many of our non-profits have tried to innovate and create ways to sustain themselves. Mr. Wallace alluded to his local art gallery having set up a boutique store. Many organizations have done that, and they just flow the profits to their non-profit side. We also know of non-profits or organizations that have allowed some type of investment to be created out of their property; people can buy into their schools or their properties, and then they're paid out a dividend over time. People who believe in their causes can buy in, and they're able to finance capital that way. Maybe that's a little bit different from what you're suggesting.
Specifically, what do you assess the needs to be in the Canadian non-profit context? People or organizations, you suggest, are selling off their properties. There may be many reasons for doing that; I would look for more information and maybe some submissions to be left with us, as well, regarding this aspect, but your assessment is that people are selling off for financial reasons. Do you believe that creating this new type of CIC, or something like a CIC, gives any evidence that it would actually increase access to capital here in the Canadian context?