There's no doubt that business continuity is important, and again I stress that all of our members are long-term shareholders, so long-term performance is really what they are getting at. It's not that shareholders would necessarily replace each and every member of a board annually, but the important point is that directors are accountable on a yearly basis, so if there is a problem, shareholders can take steps to direct it inside of three years. A lot of damage can be done to a business with an underperforming board or underperforming individual directors over a three-year period. And of course if the terms are staggered so that they're coming up at different times, it can take longer than three years to change an entire board because the three-year terms won't necessarily come up at the same time.
