I certainly take the point, and here's our thinking around it. It would be okay with us if public companies--and that's the realm we're in--wanted to do it both ways. Everybody put their hands in the air and then everybody mark a ballot. What's crucial for us is to get the vote tallies. A lot of our senior investors indicate how they voted on their websites. Mutual funds have to do it and some of the large pension funds do it and even some foundations are getting into this, so there's a fair amount of transparency.
Just as transparency is something we want from corporations, transparency is something that's increasingly demanded of large institutional investors who are voting these shares, and that's an asset of their fund--a vote is worth something. They're voting the shares on behalf of their beneficiaries. We don't have a lot of difficulties getting both the companies and the investors themselves to come forth with the results on the votes and who voted which way. The retail investors are protected, and I'm okay with that. They can announce on their own blogs how they voted if they wish. So both can happen.