Well, with those numbers, it wouldn't make any sense to prosecute a civil action, quite frankly. So it may not be possible to get access to enforce that in the civil system, but at a higher threshold, at some point it would make economic sense for somebody to pursue damages, particularly class action plaintiffs. I don't represent class action plaintiffs' bar, but there would be some interest at a certain appropriate level to go after insiders for sizeable trades, particularly if there's a treble damages component to it. In other words, the $50,000 would become $150,000, and that would be spread among the number of traders who were opposite that in that window.
You can come up with a model that might make some economic sense for somebody to pursue, but I don't think at $50,000 you would even be close.