I alluded to this in my remarks, but basically there is a huge range of not-for-profits, and you mentioned some of them in your question.
The bill does not try to address every aspect of every not-for-profit. It sets up a broad framework in which all not-for-profits operate. It tries to be as general as it can, and lets the not-for-profit itself deal with some of the policy issues that may or may not benefit one more than it would another not-for-profit.
So the areas you mentioned--such as training, stable funding--are really separate policy areas from this incorporation regime. They would have to be addressed. I'm sure you'll help government address them in a vigorous way, in a separate way, because it's not the purpose of the act to address those issues where they impact specific not-for-profits.