I think it really comes down to that. I guess the philosophy that I understood from the business corporation statutes, both in Ontario and federally, is that they are basically facilitative. They set a framework that the individual can take advantage of to create the corporation they want. They don't try to regulate it per se. It's the statute that says how you create a corporation where you want to have limited liability.
I think the classification system then takes us more into regulation rather than into being a prescriptive, facilitative entity to create the corporate vehicle. On the classification issue, whether it's a charity, how you're classifying--those are issues that are relevant for tax purposes and some other purposes and are governed by other regulation. Why would we duplicate that? That's another argument against that classification.