I don't see any specific infringement other than what I've specified. For example, I think part 6 does infringe on provincial jurisdiction over securities transfers. That already exists at the provincial level. So it's not necessarily taking the power away from the province; it's an overlap with the province that's already regulated at the provincial level.
Securities regulation is generally a provincial matter. Until there is a federal regulator, it is provincial jurisdiction.
For example, in regard to the publicly issued debt obligations of a federal not-for-profit corporation, it's a little bit hard to imagine this happening, but if there was a federal not-for-profit corporation issuing debt under a trust indenture, it would be covered by part V of the Ontario Business Corporations Act, because it covers any type of issuer that issues its securities in Ontario. So this is an overlap to some extent. British Columbia has it. Other provinces don't regulate trust indentures at all.
In the United States, it's based on where the issuer is issuing its securities. In other words, the jurisdiction is based on whether you are raising money in that jurisdiction, not on the jurisdiction of your incorporation.
So yes, I think there are some places where there is a little bit of an encroachment on provincial jurisdiction. Those are the two that I would highlight.
I would also mention directors' liability for unpaid employee wages. Generally most not-for-profit corporations are not federal undertakings, and their labour laws are governed by provincial law, not federal law, not the Canada Labour Code. Protection of employee wages is a matter of provincial law. This is an overlap. This law, by imposing liability on directors, overlaps with the provinces where the employees have provincial employment standards legislation covering them.