I think it's absolutely a fundamentally important distinction. Really, I think it's inarguable.
Let me explain a couple of things. There are only seven rules that differentiate. It's a badge that fits different types of corporations. If you're a soliciting corporation, all it really means is that there are seven rules that are a little bit different for you than they would be for a non-soliciting corporation.
Three of those, I think, can't be argued. First, on liquidation, where do the moneys go? If you've been receiving money from the public, it should not go back to the members. That's clear under the act. To me, this is a fundamental distinction that you need.
Unanimous members' agreements have no application for soliciting corporations, so they shouldn't be applicable to those. Also, there is the filing of financial statements. That kind of transparency really only applies where the public is involved.
There are other rules you can debate, such as the number of directors and so forth, but you fundamentally need that distinction.