I don't want to be a cynic, but I have heard that before in terms of many other products and services. I think one of the reasons that we had the incumbents under protection was to create a national infrastructure, and it was for more than just the consumer end of it: it was national security and a whole series of different elements of the devices that we are using throughout the system.
I would like to hear whether there is a commitment for increased consumer protection in the philosophy of your companies. Maybe there's not.
I'm not satisfied, and I think that maybe the vast majority of Canadians are wrong. They don't feel as consumers that they are.... You argue that the incumbents are not giving those services, but what would you do differently to guarantee that they will be passed on to them?