Thank you, Mr. Chair.
What's important about this is that you're testifying in front of us today about a position that I am actually a little concerned about with regard to the fact that no charges were laid. But the minister has been out there basically pushing the issue individually on your organization. Then we have literature paid for by the Canadian taxpayers, with a discussion about the Conservative Party and a picture of the minister and discussion points. Also, if you want to ask who's on the right track to protect consumers, it has the party leaders across the board that you can check off. What ends up happening is that people check them off and that goes into the data bank system they have, which they use for other types of mailings.
How do you feel, in terms of coming forth to the committee...? Once again, I've been concerned about the fact that no charges were laid, so I don't know whether the evidence wasn't strong enough or if Measurement Canada has been too lax. But it doesn't seem like much of a fair court here, when the fact of the matter is that the minister has singled you out in the actual discussion and we potentially have literature going out across the country--and we don't know if this is the only member it's been sent to. This looks like a template to me, where you can pop in the person's name.