Yes, it is accurate.
I also want to emphasize that the regulatory component of this, the development of the regulations, is going to be a very important part, because the legislation as it is today does not define a violation. The Library of Parliament's legislative review rightfully points out that there are offences that are criminal and there are contraventions that are non-criminal. In the legislation, a violation is currently defined as anything that contravenes the act and can be defined in the regulatory phase.
We think that definition is very important, particularly in this environment of the press that has surrounded this piece of legislation. There seems to be a bit of an atmosphere of witch-hunting or “gotcha”, which we certainly don't expect to be translated into anything by Measurement Canada, other than what is absolutely necessary to ensure the confidence of consumers. We want to make sure of that during the regulatory phase, and we'll be working closely with them to ensure that's the case.