We support the goals of the bill because its purpose is to make sure that people get their money's worth. The problem is that it is implying that individuals are almost acting deliberately to not give them their money's worth. It's not acceptable to introduce that kind of bias in the debate.
Basically, establishing a monitoring system to make sure that people get their money's worth is like apple pie: everyone supports it. Furthermore, these criteria do not exist in several provinces in Canada, as the officials already explained to you. They were withdrawn in the 1980s. In some areas of Canada it is felt that it would be safer for consumers to re-establish that system. Regardless, the system already exists in Quebec.