Chair and witnesses, I'm concerned that we've lost perspective of what really drives consumers and the concerns they have. In 2008, when this article was written, the real issue driving prices through the roof had a lot to do with derivative trading and speculation following the NYMEX between January of 2008 and somewhere around July 4, 2008, with the highest prices we had ever seen. At the time, this committee had spent one day--before the Prime Minister pulled the plug on the election, and I know Mr. Van Kesteren and Mr. Masse were there--in which we were able to ferret out or focus on the real driver of the cost of fuel to consumers.
Having said this, the concern I have heard expressed by some of you here is one that I think deserves more consideration. The government contents itself with the possibility of a $20 million penalty or hit to consumers; however, the half-percent tolerance by Measurement Canada that I referred to a little earlier, if I am to extrapolate that among the 45 million litres of gasoline and another 20 million of diesel, could potentially lead to a $200 million skew against consumers.
So rather than deal with the smoke and mirrors this legislation is providing, I'm wondering if you have any comment as to your concern about the absence of draft regulations. The devil truly is in the details, and I think Ms. Savage you referred to this. I'm not sure I'm comfortable as a member of Parliament giving a blank cheque without understanding the details. Have you had any consultation with Measurement Canada that gives you any relief from the possibility...that you know what is in those draft regulations? They really are the meat and substance of what we're talking about here.