I think my concern, and the concern of my party, has been that we've drawn conclusions and assumptions and erected a piece of legislation based on the belief that the numbers that you provided were accurate, and yet we have nobody other than yourselves to question or to look to when it comes to accuracy in measurements.
Now you're saying that the minister's announcement a month and a half ago was based on ten years of data. In that, the minister pointed out, as I said earlier, that two out of three of the 6% that were askew do not favour consumers.
Mr. McGregor's article and his interpretation of Measurement Canada's study appeared slightly preceding and perhaps during some of the tests that you were undertaking, and it was far greater than that.
Is it fair to say that the public is confused or that the public doesn't have access to information that is both credible and peer-reviewed?