What does it say when you have one particular position taken by the minister on the long form, to remove the mandatory aspect of it, and not the same with, say, the agricultural form, on the form relating to, say, the short form, if...?
Is there a possibility that this patchwork of obligations not only creates confusion above the government's narrative that the intrusion of privacy is encouraging people not to be there...? What does that do, apart from creating absolute confusion?