I will ask this of all of you here. With regard to the integrity of the information that is before us, whether it is mandatory or not mandatory, it seems to me that if you want an outcome, say for instance on jury duty, or for instance if you want to ensure that...I don't know; I don't see the government making a request to remove the mandatory aspects of filing an income tax. There are certain public goods that tend to put that sort of utilitarian process of the good of the many coming before the interests of the individual.
If we're talking about mandatory from the perspective of fines and jail, that may be one thing, but without that potential for compliance, without the certainty of compliance, I'm wondering how can you then make an argument that a voluntary or less onerous penalty would have the same effect.
Mr. McLeish, could you expand on what you're trying to establish as a potential compromise?