You're absolutely right on the process. The questions are always put to cabinet. As Mr. Bernier indicated, the 2006 census would have gone to cabinet in 2005. At the latest, the questions for the 2011 census will go to cabinet in December 2010. They're proposed by Statistics Canada, but they are under the ultimate control of the cabinet. They can absolutely be changed.
I don't think it's fruitful at this time to go through every one of those questions, but I would refer you to the set of principles we have put out as an advisory committee. One of the key ones is that if you can get it on a reliable basis from another form, then don't put it on a long form of the census. You can get a number of these things.
Much of the discussion has been around a binary choice. You can continue it exactly as it was or you can move away from it, and I don't think it needs to be that way. It can be moulded into something that causes less difficulty. Keeping that in mind, as an advisory council we tried to determine how many complaints there had been through the privacy commission, the Prime Minister's Office, the Privy Council Office, and Statistics Canada directly. There were about 100 on the 2006 census out of over 30 million who would have filled out the long form--roughly one-twentieth of who would have filled out the long form.