From the perspective of data quality, which is really my issue, StatsCan has a world-class reputation that we produce the best possible data at the least possible cost. That is our mantra.
But as the minister said, there could be other things on the government's mind just beyond data quality. For example, he said that the threat of jail and fines, the questions, and all of that stuff, are important to the government. We don't have any issue with that.
The only thing I'm trying to highlight here is that if you go down the path of going from mandatory to voluntary, it is going to have an impact on the quality of our data. Of course it is going to go down. And that's where we left it.
As I said in my response to an earlier question, we are loyally implementing a decision from the government, whether we like it or not, and we have no issue with it.