So at least we've got the premise of the difference of opinion here, because what we have been stating is that we do not believe it is appropriate for Canadians to feel threatened and be forced to divulge what they may consider to be private information. We believe that the information that you require--and we agree that the information serves a very useful purpose--can be gleaned through other methods rather than coercion or threats of imprisonment.
If you receive that information, which is very valuable, and it was given on a voluntary basis--because the government was able to persuade the Canadian public that this information was important--then it wouldn't impact your work whatsoever, would it? You would have the information that you require.