I'm referring to the last meeting we held. I think that was similar to what we're proposing today. Despite the short notice, we all came here and had the meeting. We received witnesses who provided high-quality testimony.
That is why, in my opinion, the time issue is not valid. So, I am in favour of Friday, August 20. We could very well hold the meeting, for example, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. since it is a Friday. I think it is quite reasonable to have the meeting on Friday, August 20, given the urgency and importance of the topic.