The question shows that there are a number of problems related to the discussion we are having. Ultimately, the question is whether the census should give an accurate measure of Canadians' reality and how that can be achieved. That is the question.
If we get into the questions in the census, we are starting to talk about content. Should we ask this question or that question? In my opinion, we have to looking at that constantly. Do we need these data or other data? This has to do with the content of the questions. But I am not sure that this is the issue here. I believe that the issue is how we can obtain an accurate measure of the reality of our society. That is the issue. The secondary issue is how to go about that, whether by requiring people to complete the long form or making the questionnaire voluntary. In general research practice, we know that, if it is voluntary, the response rate for certain segments of the population will not be high enough to give an accurate picture of the reality of those subpopulations. They are precisely the ones who are most vulnerable. The government should know their reality.
It is important to always come back to the objectives. Otherwise, we could look at the long-form questionnaire and ask ourselves whether each question should be asked. I am quite sure that Statistics Canada does that and that it does not work alone. I am certain that it brings in experts in a whole range of fields to determine which questions are really necessary. If you believe that certain questions could be changed or other variables are needed, then I think that it is part of your job as the government to tell Statistics Canada. But that has nothing to do with the fact that the measure must be accurate and that there are not a whole lot of ways to go about that.
There is another issue, and it has to do with methodology...
I am sorry. This is your forum.