We know that they decided to take back the resource. A number of communities are asking us to do that, because their survival is at stake. If the companies retain their timber lease or make sure that they retain their rights with respect to water or land… The problem is that we cannot ask an investor to come back in if he won't have access to the resource. That is why I asked the question about NAFTA. I realize that may not be directly connected to the survival of the forest industry, but it does affect the communities' ability to survive.
I mentioned the summit on the forest industry. Mr. Shipley said there had been one. I understand why there wasn't one: they are calling a four-hour meeting a summit. I wonder what can really be accomplished in four hours, particularly since this is a crisis of national proportions.
I understand the problems. Can you tell us what your thoughts are on a potential forestry summit, on how long it should last and on who should take part?