I think there are several points you made there, so let me try to touch on them.
First, the NAFTA claim really didn't have anything to do with the filing. It had to do with the actions of a province of Canada related to a mill closure. Time-wise, we did that before we filed. So it was before we filed for creditor protection, and it was related to the destruction of market demand and the cost position of that asset.
To answer the second part of the question about NAFTA, the funds of the NAFTA settlement are not in the $1.5 billion; they are in the exit financing. We will use those funds to lower the amount of debt we have to put on the company going forward, which is a very positive thing for our employees and our investors. So the less debt we put on this company, the more viable we are to deal with all the market forces we've been describing.
What was the other part of your question?