So you are suggesting that Apotex has a motivation to use this for other purposes than to do simply more work in Rwanda, for example. Because of the way the legislation is written, when Rwanda found out later on that they needed more medications, they had to actually go back and re-apply; they can't get an extension for more treatments.
So are you suggesting that Apotex is going to try to use this legislation to do something different from what they have done?