Could I just shift back to a piece of legislation that may have been a precursor to this or that happened at the same time, Bill S-232? The senator has now retired. I did speak to him at one point.
With reference to streamlining the applications process within CAMR, I wonder if the following has been considered by the departments involved, where one obtains a licence in order to renew that licence and they have to go through the same process. I think part of the legislation was to minimize that period of time and to have one licence for one particular product for one particular case.
Is that something that's been considered by the Department of Industry as being acceptable if we were to continue down the road of trying to gain momentum? As we all know, Apotex has made it very clear that it no longer intends to produce or supply under the current regime as it stands.