Chairman, thank you.
With respect to the issue of the relationship between amendments to CAMR and WTO obligations, the first thing I need to say is that of course it's only at the conclusion of a dispute settlement process in the WTO that you know with any complete certainty that there's been a violation found. Up until that point, it's a series of allegations, arguments, and interpretations.
Certainly the policy analysis that has been done in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade on this issue suggests that to the extent that the CAMR is amended in such a way as to no longer reflect or implement the terms of what is a waiver from TRIPS obligations, the risk increases that we'll be off-side of those TRIPS obligations. I think that's the best answer I can give you at this point.