I tend to agree with everything you said, Mr. Lake.
I guess the other thing I would bring forward, again speaking about ENG, is that we have different types of organizations that are accredited. We have manufacturers as well as utilities. A manufacturer, for example, may institute some in-process verification of a meter that would count toward the final verification or the final inspection. That won't be the same methodology that's used by hydro, when it's doing its verification or re-verification because it has a different product in front of it.
I think the process that we have in place now allows us some flexibility to deal with different types of stakeholders. If we start focusing on everything being the same cookie-cutter approach, what we'll find is that the manufacturers will be telling us, “This is far too costly. We don't want to verify these meters any more. You guys do them.” It could be an outcome.