Thank you, Mr. Chair.
It's been helpful, as this discussion has continued to evolve here. Just to recap, we understand that this amendment only deals with the ENG sector.
If I hear you correctly, Mr. Cotton, you're saying two things. One is, “if ain't broke, don't fix it,” which I completely get and understand. I think you're also concerned about the potential consequences of resourcing this, and the added bureaucracy and cost to either your department or government.
To help focus us on this, I want to ask a question. In addition to those two concerns that I've touched on, are you concerned about potential adverse impacts, either intended or unintended, of this proposed amendment on consumers? That's ultimately what this is all about.